Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur

Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur

The Supreme Court of Canada overturns the Court of Appeal’s decision, dismissing the case and upholding the trial judge’s decision. Background The Lapointe’s five-year-old daughter sustained a severe cut to her elbow, resulting in significant bleeding and the severing...
Pinch (Guardian ad litem of) v. Morwood

Pinch (Guardian ad litem of) v. Morwood

The defendants’ appeal to overturn the trial judgment, which held them responsible for shortcomings in prenatal maternal monitoring, was unsuccessful.  The Court of Appeal upholds the trial judge’s findings of negligence in a medical malpractice case,...
White Burgess v. Abbott

White Burgess v. Abbott

The ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT EVIDENCE The case of White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co. is a landmark legal case that clarified the admissibility of expert evidence in civil cases in Canada.  Background In 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada heard the...
Hanson-Tasker v. Ewart 2022 BCSC 432

Hanson-Tasker v. Ewart 2022 BCSC 432

PROVING THAT INJURIES WERE CAUSED BY NEGLIENCE. Doctors are found negligent but the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the case due to the plaintiff’s inability to prove that the injuries were primarily caused by the negligence. Background Kycree Hanson-Takser...
Reibl v. Hughes, 1980 CanLII 23

Reibl v. Hughes, 1980 CanLII 23

INFORMED CONSENT and MEDICAL MALPRACTICE The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Reibl v. Hughes held that a plaintiff must be properly informed of the risks of a medical procedure before giving consent. Background The plaintiff, Riebl, suffered a massive...